RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY
CASE NUMBER: PD1201142 TDRL ENTRY DATE: 20020101
BOARD DATE: 20130214 TDRL EXIT DATE: 20030206
SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this
covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (25V/Combat Document Production
Specialist), medically separated for radiation induced pulmonary fibrosis following treatment of
Stage III-B Hodgkins disease. The CI did not improve adequately with treatment to meet the
physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness
standards. She was issued a permanent P3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board
(MEB). Stage III-B Hodgkins disease; evidence of radiation induced pulmonary fibrosis; chronic
chest pain, status post (s/p) sternotomy; short of breath and dyspnea on exertion;
environmental allergies; and history of fracture of the right fourth toe, identified in the rating
chart below, were also identified and forwarded by the MEB. The CI was placed on Temporary
Disability Retired List (TDRL) with ratings as reflected in the chart below. Following later re-
evaluation, the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the radiation induced pulmonary
fibrosis following treatment of Stage III-B Hodgkins disease as unfitting, rated 10%, with
application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no
appeals, and was medically separated with a 10% disability rating.
CI CONTENTION: The range of conditions I suffer from and the severity of the effects for
residual effects of chemo and radiation limit me greatly. This I believe should have my rating at
100%. My overall is 90% regardless of the 170% of disability determined. The effects of
treatment has left (sic) me at current age 34, with stabbing sensations in legs and chest,
difficulty breathing with aerobics activities, severe back pain, which in turn causes sciatica,
CVID-an immune deficiency, scars and pain in chest from sternotomy. Not to mention upset
stomach (currently being evaluated for my gallbladder) from pain medicine and a very poor self
image. The CI attached a lengthier one page statement pleading her application which was
reviewed by the Board and considered in its recommendations.
SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI
6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined
by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the
CI, those condition(s) identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB. The ratings
for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The Stage III-B Hodgkins disease; radiation
induced pulmonary fibrosis; chronic chest pain, status post (s/p) sternotomy; and short of
breath and dyspnea on exertion conditions requested for consideration meet the criteria
prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview, and are accordingly addressed below. Any
conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Boards
defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for
Correction of Military Records.
TDRL RATING COMPARISON:
Service PEB Dated 20030116
VA* All Effective Date 20020102
Condition
Code
Rating
Condition
Code
Rating
Exam
On TDRL 20011016
TDRL
Sep.
Radiation Induced
Pulmonary Fibrosis
Following Treatment Of
Stage III-B Hodgkin's
Disease
7709-
6830
30%
10%
Pulmonary Fibrosis
Secondary to Therapy for
Stage III Hodgkins Disease
6830
10%
20020131
20040408
Stage III Hodgkins Disease
s/p
7709
0%
20020131
20040408
Chronic Chest Pain
Not
unfit
Short of Breath & Dyspnea
on Exertion
Environmental Allergies
Not Unfitting
Sinusitis
6511
0%
20020131
History of Fracture of Rt 4th Toe
Not Unfitting
S/P Right 4th Toe Fracture
5299-5284
0%
20020131
.No Additional MEB/PEB Entries.
Chronic Anxiety
9413
10%
20020131
Scars S/P Sternotomy
7899-7804
10%
20020131
20040408
Neuropathy, 4th and 5th
Fingers, Bilat Feet
8599-8516
10%
20020131
0% x 2/Not Service Connected x 5
20020131
Combined: 10%
Combined: 30%*
*VARD 20040408 did not change ratings on pulmonary fibrosis or painful scar conditions. VA increased combined rating with
additional conditions added on 20090804 VARD
ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the sentiment expressed in the CIs application
regarding the significant impairment with which her service-incurred condition continues to
burden her. It is a fact, however, that the Disability Evaluation System (DES) has neither the
role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential
complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. This role and authority is granted
by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA). The Board utilizes DVA evidence
proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations; and, DoDI 6040.44 defines a 12-
month interval for special consideration to post-separation evidence. The Boards authority as
defined in DoDI 6040.44, however, resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness
determinations and rating decisions for disability at the time of separation. Post-separation
evidence therefore is probative only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability and
fitness implications at the time of separation.
Radiation Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis following treatment of Stage III-B Hodgkins Disease. The
narrative summary (NARSUM) at TDRL entry noted that the CI was treated for Stage III
Hodgkins disease with chemotherapy followed by radiation treatment. Evaluation at the time
of the NARSUM indicated no evidence of disease (NED). At the MEB exam, about 13 months
post completion of chemotherapy and radiation treatment, the CI reported difficulty with
dyspnea on exertion (DOE) with activity such as walking briskly, and chest pain from the
sternotomy, as well as palpitations and pounding heart beats with anxiety and easy fatigability.
The MEB examiner (a pulmonologist) noted a mid-sternal scar, but the exam was otherwise
normal, including the pulmonary exam. CT scan from 6 months earlier showed a mediastinal
mass that was smaller than previously and radiation induced interstitial changes.
Echocardiogram showed a small pericardial effusion, not hemodynamically significant.
Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) showed evidence of mild restriction, with an FVC of 66%
predicted normal and a normal diffusing capacity (DLCO). Cardiopulmonary stress testing was
suggestive of deconditioning and a restrictive process with a maximal exercise capacity (VO2) of
1.18 liters. The diagnoses were Stage-III Hodgkins disease, with apparent cure; radiation
induced pulmonary fibrosis; chronic chest pain, status post sternotomy; short of breath (SOB)
and DOE; environmental allergies; history of fracture of right fourth toe. The examiners
opinion was that the CIs significant DOE was multifactorial including treatment residuals and
deconditioning. He also stated that Given the amount of her pain and impairment she would
be unable to perform the duties associated with her MOS. She was referred to the PEB due to
pulmonary fibrosis and other conditions including restrictive defect and chronic chest pain
status post sternotomy which limited her ability to engage in exercise and physical exertion.
The PEB placed the CI on TDRL with a 30% rating because her condition was not stable enough
for final adjudication.
At the TDRL re-evaluation exam, the CI reported that there had been improvement in her chest
pain but she still had DOE with some activities. She was not on any medication for these
conditions. The MEB physical exam noted the CI was in no apparent distress with a normal
respiratory rate and normal oxygen saturation on pulse oximetry. The chest was noted to be
post median sternotomy; lungs were clear with equal breath sounds bilaterally and good air
movement. There were no abnormalities noted on the remainder of the exam. Chest X-ray
and chest CT scan were done the same day and showed post-surgical changes and fibrosis of
the left upper lobe and anterior mediastinum. PFTs in October 2002 showed an FVC of 77%
predicted normal, and a normal DLCO. The interpretation of the PFTs was mild restrictive
disease confirmed by lung volumes and a normal DLCO and stable. In the summary of the CIs
present condition, the examiner stated Over the course of the past year, her chest pain has
improved. This has allowed her to increase her activities and help correct part of her
component of deconditioning. However, she still remains with restrictive lung disease. The
diagnoses were Hodgkins Disease post treatment with apparent cure; radiation induced
pulmonary fibrosis; persistent DOE; and environmental allergies.
At the initial VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam, about a month after TDRL entry, the CI
reported DOE and dizziness, with change of positions. This was opined to be treatment related
by her treating physicians. She also complained of numbness and tingling of both legs and to
her fourth and fifth fingers of her hands. This was attributed to radiation and chemo effects as
well. On exam, multiple chest scars were noted. The lungs were clear. Neurological and
musculoskeletal exams were normal. Chest X-rays showed post-surgical changes, lungs were
clear with minimal bi-apical scar. PFT showed an FVC of 80% predicted normal. At a C&P exam
about 14 months post separation the CI complained of DOE. Lung exam was normal. Chest X-
rays showed no active disease. (PFTs were done but no results are in the record.) PFTs were
noted to be normal one year earlier. The chest wall and scar exam was unchanged from the
prior VA exam noted above.
The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. At
TDRL entry the PEB adjudicated the combined diagnoses of Stage-III Hodgkins Disease;
pulmonary fibrosis; chest pain post sternotomy; and SOB/DOE as unfitting, rated as 7709-6830
at 30% and placed the CI on TDRL. The VA rated 6830 (pulmonary fibrosis secondary to therapy
for Stage-III Hodgkins Disease) at 10% and 7899-7804 (scar status post-sternotomy) at 10%, as
well as multiple other conditions not adjudicated by the PEB, and therefore not within the
Boards scope IAW DoDI 6040.44, as previously noted.
Rating criteria for 6830 (radiation induced pulmonary pneumonitis and fibrosis) are based on
the VASRD General Rating Formula for Interstitial Lung Disease and are: PFT results of FVC;
DLCO; and for the higher ratings, maximal exercise capacity. The PEB bundled the MEB
diagnoses of Hodgkins Disease with apparent cure; pulmonary fibrosis; chest pain post
sternotomy; and SOB/DOE and provided one rating. The Board agreed this was a reasonable
approach to rating the CIs disability based on the listed diagnoses as it was not possible to
separate the restrictive effects of pain or limited chest wall movement post sternotomy on
pulmonary function from the effect of pulmonary fibrosis. The VA rated a painful scar on the
right chest at 10%. The chronic chest pain referred to in the NARSUM was referring to pain due
to post-operative pain of the still healing chest wall post-sternotomy, not a painful scar. The
NARSUM addendum lists complications including restrictive lung defect secondary to
sternotomy and local chest wall pain with inspiration/expiration. The Board adjudged that
there is insufficient evidence in the record to support the painful scar on the right chest wall as
a separately unfitting condition. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and
mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), and VASRD §4.14 (avoidance of pyramiding), the
Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB
adjudication for the radiation induced pulmonary fibrosis, secondary to treatment for Stage-III-
B Hodgkins disease, currently NED, with chest pain post sternotomy and DOE condition at the
time of TDRL entry.
At the end of TDRL, the PEB adjudicated the radiation induced pulmonary fibrosis following
treatment of Stage-III-B Hodgkins disease as unfitting, coded 7709-6830 at 10%. The PEB
found the conditions of chest pain post sternotomy and SOB/DOE to be not unfitting as they
had improved during the period of TDRL. The VA continued ratings of 6830 (pulmonary fibrosis
secondary to) at 10% and 7899-7804 (scar status post-sternotomy) at 10%. At the time of
separation, the CIs PFTs had improved with an FVC of 77% predicted normal and therefore the
PEB rated the CIs condition at the time of separation as 7709-6830 at 10%. The Board
deliberated whether IAW VASRD §4.96 (Special provisions regarding evaluation of respiratory
conditions) the disability of the combined effects of chest pain post-sternotomy and pulmonary
fibrosis met the criteria for elevation to the next higher evaluation of 30%. The Board opined
that post-sternotomy chest pain was not a separate respiratory condition and any impact with
pulmonary restriction was considered under the CIs unfitting pulmonary fibrosis condition and
therefore, the next higher evaluation was not supported.
The CIs PFTs fell within the FVC of 75% to 80% predicted range and met the 10% rating criteria
under the General Rating Formula for Interstitial Lung Disease. After due deliberation,
considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) and IAW VASRD
§4.97, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the
PEB adjudication for the radiation induced pulmonary fibrosis, secondary to treatment for
Stage-III-B Hodgkins disease condition at the time of separation.
Contended PEB Conditions. The contended conditions adjudicated as not unfitting by the PEB
at the end of TDRL were chest pain post-sternotomy and SOB/DOE conditions. The Boards first
charge with respect to these conditions is an assessment of the appropriateness of the PEBs
fitness adjudications. The Boards threshold for countering fitness determinations is higher
than the VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) standard used for its rating recommendations, but
remains adherent to the DoDI 6040.44 fair and equitable standard. The TDRL re-evaluation
NARSUM stated the CIs chest pain had improved. The CI offered no complaint regarding the
chest pain at the exam. The CIs DOE had originally been described as multifactorial due to
deconditioning and significant contributions from chest pain and pulmonary fibrosis. At the re-
evaluation exam it was noted that the CI had improved exertional dyspnea, her chest pain had
improved allowing more activity and consequently improved conditioning. The record supports
that the conditions of chest pain post sternotomy and DOE had improved between TDRL entry
and re-evaluation and were reasonably found to be not unfitting at the time of separation.
After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board
concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness
determination for the either of the contended conditions; and, therefore, no additional
disability ratings can be recommended.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not
surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD
were exercised. In the matter of the radiation induced pulmonary fibrosis following treatment
of Stage III-B Hodgkins disease condition with consideration of chest pain post sternotomy and
dyspnea on exertion conditions the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEBs
30% TDRL entry adjudication. In the matter of the radiation induced pulmonary fibrosis
following treatment of Stage III-B Hodgkins disease condition the Board unanimously
recommends no change in the PEBs 10% permanent separation adjudication at TDRL exit. In
the matter of the contended chest pain post sternotomy and shortness of breath/dyspnea on
exertion conditions, at TDRL exit, the Board unanimously recommends no change from the PEB
determinations as not unfitting. There were no other conditions within the Boards scope of
review for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of
the CIs disability and separation determination, as follows:
UNFITTING CONDITION
VASRD CODE
RATING
PERMANENT
Radiation Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis Following
Treatment of Stage III-B Hodgkins Disease
7709-6830
10%
COMBINED
10%
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120703, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF
Acting Director
Physical Disability Board of Review
SFMR-RB
MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB / xxxxxxxxxxxxxx), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557
SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, AR20130003961 (PD201201142)
I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD
PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under
the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Boards
recommendation and hereby deny the individuals application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress
who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:
Encl xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Deputy Assistant Secretary
(Army Revier Boards)
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00774
The PEB adjudicated the chronic left lung condition as unfitting, rated 10%, five years after being placed on TDRL, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The exams documented improving weight, negative serology titers for coccidiomycosis yet continued symptoms of dyspnea on exertion (DOE), chest pain and headaches. At the final TDRL MEB exam, the CI reported no improvement.
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00163
The CI was placed on Limited Duty (LIMDU) on 20050908 for the GSW to the chest and RUE. Chest Condition . In light of the evidence of impairment indicated by the numerous treatment notes for chest pain (also see the PTSD condition with chest pain as a contributor), the NMA statement, and the post-separation continued disability due to the chest condition, the CI’s chest condition should be recharacterized as a separate unfitting and ratable disability at the time of separation.
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02765
The requested sleep apnea, anxiety, hypertension and rhinitis conditions were not identified by the PEB, and therefore not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board.Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records. Asthma Condition . The PEB TDRL exit rating was 10%,with the disability description stating: “not...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00070
Chest Pain Rating . The Board considered whether to re-adjudicate the underlying chest pathology as separately unfitting, especially considering the possibility of pulmonary compromise ratable at 10% from the pre-separation PFT’s. IAW §4.3 of the VASRD (reasonable doubt), therefore, the Board decided by a 2:1 vote that the scar code was indicated as an addition to the separation rating.
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02736
The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Asthma660210%Asthma/Obstructive Pulmonary Disease6604-660230%20080211Other x2 (Not in Scope)Other x6 RATING: 10%RATING: 80%*Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20080917 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) ANALYSIS...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02461
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD-2013-02461BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE BOARD DATE: 20140724 SEPARATION DATE: 20050914 The next higher rating of 30% requires FEV-1 of 56% to 70% or FEV-1/FVC of 56%to 70% on PFT; or daily inhalational or oral bronchodilator therapy; or inhalational anti-inflammatory (steroid) medication.The VA coded the lung condition analogous to chronic bronchitisas 6600 rated at 30% citing an FEV-1 of 60% from the PFT...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00419
The Board carefully considered the frequency and nature of the CI’s headaches including objective evidence and corroborating subjective evidence.For TDRL entry rating, both the Service and VA ratings were 30% using the criteria from disability code 8100. The CI was using a Proventil inhaler and had normal lung radiographs.At the VA C&P exam, approximately 3 months after TDRL entry, the CI claimed heart murmur, dyspnea, pulmonary edema and bronchitis was not comprehensively evaluated as the...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00224
After 12 months of TDRL the asthma condition was considered to be stable, but still unfitting. The Board does not have the authority under DoDI 6040.44 to render fitness or rating recommendations for any conditions not considered by the DES. The Board therefore has no reasonable basis for recommending any additional unfitting conditions for separation rating.
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00424
Hip Condition . In the matter of the hip condition, the Board unanimously recommends permanent separation rating of 10% for each hip, coded 5299-5255 IAW VASRD §4.40, §4.45, §4.59, and §4.71a. Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of permanent disability retirement effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00634
The 7 September 2004 PEB found the CI unfit for status post PE, resolved, rated at 0% disability with category II and III (not unfitting/not compensable) diagnoses of OSA, PFS, myofascial pain (new diagnosis), chronic fatigue secondary to deconditioning, and obesity. The examiner opined that the CI had a history of bilateral PE, but was doing well on coumadin therapy; however, the etiology of the chronic joint pain was unclear. The PEB applied the code 6354 (chronic fatigue syndrome [CFS])...